# 2026-04-18

- Verified gateway status: runtime running, RPC probe ok, loopback-only gateway active.
- Session count sanity check returned 16 sessions, within normal range.
- Continued LinkedIn Job Search Phase 1 work: validated Notion Sender-first extraction into enriched properties, wired qualification scoring onto live records, and updated the PRD prose to reflect the R3 implementation.
- Confirmed the enriched Notion Sender pipeline is operational on new records and that Dorian enrichment writes back Fit Score / Strategy / Research Payload / Last Updated.
- Began Telegram relay testing with a test digest generated from the scored CyberCoders / Plant Manager record.
- Memory/active-thread files were checked; `active-thread.md` was absent.
- LinkedIn Job Search workflow progress: Phase 1 completed and validated end-to-end in Notion/Telegram. Validated architecture is Notion Sender first-pass extraction into enriched schema, then Dorian applies qualification/scoring/research enrichment on the same live records.
- Checkpoint findings: active Notion Sender intake schema was initially raw-only; enriched properties were later added directly to the active data source and validated on new incoming records.
- Drafting rule learned: recruiter-response drafts must follow Phase C Template B exactly — acknowledge outreach, lead with credential paragraph using resume specifics, then brief interest/scope-comp sentence, then close with resume/contact info. Earlier question-led draft structure was explicitly rejected.
- Approved drafting pattern stored in PRD: recruiter-response worked example should be reused for future recruiter outreach, especially food/manufacturing roles where recruiter needs concrete ammo (Reconserve, regulated environment, bakery/food client names).
- Resume source updated during session: revised canonical resume received from Braden correcting employee-count detail; use latest resume attachment from 2026-04-18 for future drafting/credential references.
- Phase 2 not yet complete. Template B validated; Template A not yet approved as worked example.
- New workflow rule discovered during QA and added to PRD: employer-resolution must occur before scoring and before Template A drafting when a forwarded alert/email does not surface the real employer. If employer is missing and source is an aggregator/job-board digest, run secondary lookup via job URL/redirect before proceeding.
- Source taxonomy correction: job-board digests should not be classified as Manual. Use LinkedIn Alert when appropriate or Job Board Digest as a distinct source class.
- Companion implementation artifact created: /Users/openclaw/.openclaw/workspace/job-search/employer_resolution.py to decide when employer lookup is required for unresolved job-board/aggregator records.
- Valid Template A candidate identified later in session: DP World / Plant Manager / Rialto, CA / $250K-$300K, employer surfaced directly from LinkedIn alert. Scored at 6.55 with strategy Connect First, and a Template A draft was produced for Braden approval.
- Remaining execution sequence after compaction: wait for Braden approval/revision on DP World Template A draft; once approved, run the 3-5 role end-to-end QA pass (deposit -> employer resolution -> parsing -> scoring -> draft -> Telegram digest -> approval response), log results, then move to Phase 3 (worker execution wiring for LinkedIn sends, follow-up timing logic, Monday 7:30 AM weekly digest cron).
